Thursday, 7 October 2010
New blogs on the New Diplomacy
http://thenewdiplomacya.blogspot.com/
http://thenewdiplomacyb.blogspot.com/
http://thenewdiplomacyc.blogspot.com/
http://thenewdiplomacyd.blogspot.com/
http://thenewdiplomacye.blogspot.com/
http://thenewdiplomacyf.blogspot.com/
http://thenewdiplomacyg.blogspot.com/
Thursday, 6 May 2010
NEW DIPLOMACY AND NGOs
The integration of NGOs in diplomacy has increased the field for many players,
many NGOs will respond to local and global dynamics in a way that is distinct from local social actors and community based organizations, employing different strategies.
According to the US Deputy Secretary of State, Strobe Talbott, "[I]n Bosnia, nine agencies and departments of the US government are co-operating with more than a dozen other governments, seven international organisations and thirteen major NGOs...to implement the Dayton Accords."
"multilevel involvement of NGOs (non-governmental organisations) in
every aspect of international negotiations has revitalised many debates with new approaches and new options, but also stifled the ability of traditional sovereign actors to operate unimpeded in their own system. In almost every instance, the state must "share the stage with sovereignty-free actors", as Lewis Rasmussen negatively defines them"
A NEW DIPLOMACY? EDWARD FINN
http://www.sam.gov.tr/perceptions/Volume5/June-August2000/VolumeVN2EdwardFinn.pdf
PUBLIC DIPLOMACY
Nye divides the purposes of public diplomacy into three distinct dimensions.
"....requiring different relative proportions of direct government information and long term cultural relationship:
The first and most immediate dimension is daily communication, which involves explaining the context of domestic and foreign policy decisions...The day to day dimension is strategic communication, in which a set of simple themes is developed, much like what occurs in a public campaign...The third dimension of public diplomacy is the development of having relationships with key individuals over many years through scholarships, exchanges, training, seminars, conferences and access to media channels....Each of these three dimensions of public diplomacy plays an important role in helping to create an attractive image of a country and this can improve its prospects for obtaining its desired outcomes."
Therefore as Nye defined public diplomacy has mainly three interpretations, which are "firstly information: information management and distribution with an emphasis on short term events or crises. Secondly influence: longer term persuasion campaigns aiming to effect attitudinal change amongst a target population( sometimes referred to as 'moving the needle') and Thirdly engagement: building relationships, also over the long term, to cultivate trust and mutual understanding between peoples( be they groups, organizations, nations, ect.)"(JRKelley)
A good example of use of public diplomacy:
After the 9/11and war in Iraq as USA gained a bad reputation, they were seen as bullies by the other states.
However as Obama was opposed to the war in Iraq and with his reliance on communication and dialogue rather than coercion and power. As well as his speech in Cairo, where he address the tension between the United States and Muslims around the world. "I have come here to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world; one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect; and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive, and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles – principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings."(Times)
President Obama Speech to Muslim World in Cairo- http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/04/us/politics/04obama.text.html
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=tY_KN8WVrEgC&pg=PA73&dq=public+diplomacy
Monday, 3 May 2010
Diplomacy and My Understanding of It
Diplomacy was used in the past in high politics and was secretive. Diplomacy was thought to be associated with a group of elites and influential people. Even though this was the case in the past, diplomacy has evolved and there are more actors involved in the present. Diplomacy does not involve states and official representatives alone, it has become more inclusive. This is what is called the ‘New Diplomacy’.
Diplomacy is a term which encompasses different factors. There is that of the practice of diplomacy (the negotiations and communication) and the mode of behaviour (the way of behaving when dealing with states and officials). Diplomacy is also an art as tact and protocol are key factors to keep in mind.
To be an official diplomat is no easy task as one has to be always aware of what one is saying and how one is saying it. The information disclosed should be that which is necessary, never too much or too little. And one should always talk on behalf of the state and never give one's own opinion.
Diplomacy is the political interaction between states in the international system. But it is no longer between states only, with the increasing role of emerging NGOs and non-state actors nowadays, this has changed.
Diplomacy is concerned with the low politics in the present as well. Often, these issues are brought to the table by NGOs. Especially with the issue of the environment in the present, NGOs have had a big influence. Climate change has been put on the agenda because NGOs have shed light and emphasised its importance. The activeness of NGOs was seen on the road to the Copenhagen Summit in December 2010.
Apart from this, I was not aware of the different opinions on diplomacy among scholars. Such as the debate about when is it that diplomacy first started and whether non-state actors and NGOs play an important role in diplomacy. There are no wrong answers, just different perspectives.
Also it is incredible how significant the role of the media is in public diplomacy nowadays. An example of this is embassies having Youtube accounts. The flow of information nowadays is unbelievably quick. As soon as something happens, the news of this can be accessed on the internet anywhere in the world. This is sometimes said to undermine the embassies and the official staff required to report back. But one can never substitute the credibility of an official staff by that of a news channel. When negotiations take place, the information and the outcome is available to the public, forming a so called ‘Open Diplomacy’. But this does not mean that issues are no longer discussed behind closed doors. It has tried to be more open, but it cannot be completely.
Diplomacy has definitely changed in the last few decades and public opinion has become quite important. It no longer deals with the sole interest of the states; this is again due to the media and how quickly the flow of information is. Diplomacy has evolved during the past decades and will continue to do so due to globalisation and the advancement of technology.
In the end, no matter how much diplomacy has evolved, the core of the essence is still the same. To get your way done and achieve what it is you want.
Sunday, 2 May 2010
Diplomacy Today
In the beginning, diplomacy in my understanding was just a tactful and peaceful way of dealing with issues and getting what you want. I associated diplomacy with the “high-profile” diplomats dealing with foreign governments to create friendly relations between their respective states in order to promote one or another cooperative dealings, whether economic, political or cultural. However now, it is possible to see that diplomacy is not simply an interaction between professional diplomats with the hosting state, but it is a complex net, which is composed of many different actors and arenas of interaction. In other words, diplomacy grasps complex web of actors, issues and ways of dealings with issues. In particular, diplomacy involves negotiating and cooperating in different arenas, such as in multilateral diplomacy, where diplomats have to deal with several states at a time in a complex structure of international organizations such as the World Bank, IMF (International Monetary Fund), UN (United Nations) and etc. Diplomats have to compete with or deal with different sources of information for credibility as well as promulgating their interests, such as the press, media, Internet and other independent sources of information such as the BBC. Also, the role of the Non-Governmental Organizations in diplomacy further complicates the way diplomacy works. Their interaction can be either cooperative or competing and conflicting. Cooperative in a matter where government can use NGO’s as a “catalytic diplomacy”[1] where they operate through and within NGO’s since they have the credibility, specialization and the trust of the public, or their interests can be conflicting where they come to opposing each others intentions, whether on moral basis or political purposes. Moreover, issues that go beyond the state boundaries such as the environment takes diplomacy into a higher, more demanding nature, where it comes to a point that it becomes simply impossible to come to any agreements since there are so many actors such as NGO’s, pressure from the press and the public to deal with, as well as many different issues that need to be considered of such as the economic factors and political power as well as general concern with future damages of the climate change for example that shapes diplomacy as the most complex game of chess, where moves have to be planned in advance by considering all the possible options from both sides, ones own as well as the opposite with various outcomes. Therefore, in my opinion diplomacy today is more complex and intermingled. However, even though I think that diplomacy is more complex in nature, I still think that no matter where diplomacy takes place, with who it communicates and interacts and how it operates, it is still conducted for the national interests of the states, whether in promoting their image, getting their way, promote their interests, gain economic cooperation, all in all it is always and only in the name and for the sake of the national interest of the states.
[1] *“Catalytic diplomacy” does not refer to operation of governments within and through NGO’s only, it is conducted on a more inclusive basis. As Riordan states: “not simply on a narrow foreign ministry level, but at a higher, more encompassing level”. (2003, p,127).
1. Riordan Shaun (2003) The New Diplomacy Polity Press, Cornwall
Friday, 30 April 2010
Diplomacy and me
First of all, we were discussing when diplomacy started. Some of us argued that it started with the emergence of a state. I would say that diplomacy started with the formation of the first proto-state systems. I have learned that it is rather difficult to draw a clear line between an 'old' and 'new' diplomacy. We were arguing when the new diplomacy started- was it after the Second World War when groundbreaking social changes occurred as the demise of the aristocracy or with the emergence of world summits and international organisations? We looked at bilateral diplomacy and the role of an embassy. It was interesting to watch how its role evolved especially with the emergence of the Internet. Thanks to this module, I had an opportunity to visit the Swedish embassy. It was a great chance to put my theoretical knowledge into practice. I can say that diplomats are fully aware of the way diplomacy is evolving and what implications it has on their job. I knew they had to be excellent communicators but I was surprised at the range of issues they have to deal with. They have to be experts at many things. Their role does not require only being fully aware of the situation in the country they are staying in and their national situation. They have to lobby for their national businesses, promote investments and tourism in their country and build a massive network of contacts. This had made me more aware of commercial and consuming diplomacy. Having assessed the importance of technological change, public diplomacy seems to me the most important aspect of the new diplomacy and also the topic I enjoyed the most. It is crucial for diplomatic actors to present a good public imagine of the state/organisation they represent as it serves their interest. They can achieve it through blogs, YouTube channels or official websites. Nation branding is very popular. Public diplomacy is also about listening to other actors in international relations and reacting to their criticism. It is about a dialogue. States even create public diplomacy strategies (you might like this video about the future of public diplomacy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PC1b8XZpy8c&feature=related). Another issue we discussed was the emergence of non-state actors in diplomacy. As mentioned before, I had state centric approach o diplomacy and I did not think non-state actors have a significant role in the conduct of diplomacy. I know that I have to consider that there are also many non-governmental organisations, international organisation, multinational corporations, interest groups and even terrorist groups that conduct their own form of diplomacy. For example, non-governmental organisations lobby state decision makers and try to influence how they develop their domestic policies. They also participate in international negotiations. Celebrities can also conduct some kind of diplomacy and they are good at attracting attention to global issues (The Live 8 concert tries to set up the global call action against poverty). I was also interested in environmental diplomacy as I had previously participated in environmental project in my home country. Lately, we discussed international negotiations on environmental issues. In my opinion, they are mostly ineffective because environmental policies are not among the main goals of states' foreign policies. The states obey "soft-law" that encompasses principles and guidelines and they seem reluctant to implement treaties into their policies. I also learned about the paradox of coercive diplomacy. This diplomacy is built on an assumption that an international actor/ state which represents a threat to an international society will behave rationally once confronted by a potential military intervention. However, this method has to be used rather sensibly as a state/ aggressor could also think it has nothing to lose and start waging a war. To sum up, I especially enjoyed themes public diplomacy, environmental diplomacy and diplomacy of the European Union.
Following the readings of scholars specialised in diplomacy, I would say that diplomacy has a dominant position in world politics.
Diplomacy is usually connected with a term "soft-power". As we all know, soft power is always contrasted with hard power- use of military force. Therefore, I hope that diplomacy will keep its position and it will be the first and hopefully the last solution when dealing not only with conflicts but a whole set of issues as it does nowadays.
I think that the success of this module reflects the fact that lot of us is taking another 'diplomatic' module next year: Public and Cultural diplomacy.
Thank you.
My Understanding of diplomacy today
Reflecting on my readings from the previous seminars and discussions my opinion of diplomacy has changed as my understanding has grown.At the start of the module i thought diplomacy was simply the way countries related with each other in terms of their foreign policies. I assumed it was relatively modern in international relations and not dating back to the earliest civilisations. Diplomacy has always been present and has simply evolved over time.The first evidence of diplomacy dates back to around 2500 BC letter inscribed on a cuneiform tablet, sent from the kingdom of Ebla to the kingdom of Hamazi (Malissen 1999:3).These findings about the ancient origins of diplomacy fascinated me quiet frankly.The aspects that i found most intriguing about diplomatic relations where those about cultural diplomacy, religion and the roles of non state actors.
Understanding of New Diplomacy
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8651095.stm
Thursday, 29 April 2010
My understanding of diplomacy today
In the beginning of the module I was not really attracted to the module. However afterwards I found it very interesting. I thought that diplomacy is negotiations only however diplomacy itself is an art its not only based on the negotiations but its an art of conducting relationships for gain without conflict.
Its methods include secrecy where secret negotiations takes place one of the main goal of the diplomacy is to further the interests of the state as dictated by history, geography and economics. Preserving widest possible freedom of action for the state as well as integrity and security. Diplomacy basically seeks to to maximise national advantage without using coercion force. In the sphere of Diplomacy Embassies and NGO's play a significant role and has substantial impacts. Representation of NGO's and the way they influence important aspects in our everyday life. Embassies have huge impact basically their job and main goal is to have a good relationship with other countries and try to get full advantage for their country. I have also understood that it is very essential to have a good effective diplomacy. I also learned that new Diplomacy still has certain concepts from old Diplomacy.
Furthermore Non-governmental organisations are components of civil society. The are active in open societies and they cover a broad spectrum of human activity. NGO's affect the diplomatic process when they succeed in rallying public support.
Another significant aspect in diplomacy is propaganda especially in public diplomacy. Propoganda is the manipulation of public opinion through the mass media newspaper and radio also banners on the streets on buses. But bilateral diplomacy between two states is done via embassy. For example in French system embassy diplomacy secrecy means keeping either the fact or the content of the negotiations secret. Ambassadors have to have full representative character.
What is diplomacy today?
The module ‘The New Diplomacy’ has been a journey. Within a space of a few weeks I have acquired such a vast amount of knowledge. Personally, when the module began I believe I had a very limited approach as to what diplomacy or diplomatic practice was. However, since the module began, my understanding and perspective of diplomatic practice has changed considerably. Not only have I spent considerable amount of time looking and trying to understand diplomatic practice through text, but have also had the opportunity to take part in practical mock diplomatic work as well as embassy visits.
What I have learnt throughout this module experience is that diplomacy isn’t one confined between states which is what I thought diplomacy ought to be and that non state actors as well as multilateral forums were ineffective nuisance. But, in a world today that has developed technologically bringing the world closer and enabling a wider arena, the dimension of diplomatic practice has changed. However, the traditional bilateral diplomatic practice is still of great importance.
Tackling bigger issues such as climate change, nuclear proliferation and poverty are better to discuss on a multilateral platform as they are problems that affect people globally. However, national security, border control and immigration are not things that can be dealt with on a multilateral dimension, they are things that concern a nation state.
To summarise, over the last month or two, I have gathered that the change in technology and communication have affected diplomatic practice, but it cannot bring into question its existence. Diplomacy is just as important as it once was, what has had t change is the style of diplomacy.
Wednesday, 28 April 2010
The new dimension of diplomacy is an essential one in the globalised world today
The most important factor to consider when looking at new diplomacy is that the world we live in now is very different to the one there was especially prior to the end of the Cold War. There has been a rapid advance in technological development and communication enabling the world to come together as a global village. This development has had an impact on the conduct of diplomatic practices. What once used to be traditional diplomacy that was largely conducted bilaterally between two nation states has opened up to a wider arena of diplomatic practice. There are many different influential non state actors in the diplomatic field with considerable with considerable influence alongside the fact that nation states are increasing their participation in multilateral relationships.
An example of the change in diplomatic practice in the European Union; in the post cold war world this Union has enabled the smaller and weaker neighbouring countries to come together in order to form and establish a stronger role on the world stage in facing the challenges that a globalised world faces such as climate change. The union together has many other benefits, of which the biggest one is the economic benefit.
There are many NGOs and other non governmental institutions that have considerable power and impact. An example of an area whereby there have been non-governmental organisations have been effective alongside governments is the Marine Strategy Directive set up to save Europe’s seas and oceans. This directive has been established with the help of both governmental organisations working alongside non-governmental organisations that have expertise in this area.
Tuesday, 27 April 2010
Commercial Diplomacy.
Commercial Diplomacy encompasses the whole analysis, advocacy, and negotiating chain that leads to international agreements on theses trade-related issues. In the highly interdependent world we live in today, the policy issues subject to trade negotiations are often very complex and touch on a myriad of domestic policy issues, legal provisions, institutional issues and political interests. It requires an in-depth analysis of all the factors that can have a bearing on the policy decision-making process at home and abroad and commercial interest at stake, the macro-economic impact of alternative policy options, the interest of all possible stakeholders and their political influence, the domestic policy issues entwined with the trade issue, the applicable domestic and international legal provisions, and the impact of media coverage on public opinion.
Diplomatic Diplomacy deals with political decision-making and exercising political influence, in fact, issues related to the access of foreigners to domestic markets, their rights to buy domestic assets such as land and businesses, and their qualification to provide a wide range of services are often even more political than purely domestic regulation by governments. Commercial Diplomacy usually requires a heavy dose of domestic policies, both at home and in the foreign country, including the active use of a wide range of advocacy and coalition-building tools.
At home, the Commercial Diplomat must utilize a full range of political advocacy tools and techniques to assure support of the home government for desired outcomes abroad, or to obtain favorable policy actions by the home government in areas such as taxation, export credits, and export controls in line with . To obtain governmental decisions favourable to the stakeholders, the commercial diplomat must be able to make effective use of advocacy tools such as letters, testimony, white papers, speeches, phone calls and personnel visits to key stakeholders and decision-makers. The Commercial Diplomat must also be successful in building coalitions within the government, industry or interest groups, or among stakeholders with political influence, thus increasing the political influence that is brought to bear in support of the desired outcome.
A good example of Commercial Diplomacy twist is that of China. Since late 1990s China has rapidly modified its diplomatic priority and turned more attention and resources to deepening its once lost connection with developing countries in many part of the world, particularly in Africa and Latin America. China has adopted a new trade strategy to penetrate the markets in underdeveloped countries in Africa and Latin America, while continuing trade with the west by carefully examining the Chinese trade partners and trade structure and the diplomatic activities related to trade. These changing trade behaviour is driven by domestic/global market needs or by economic power and importance in global trade, and applying trade penetration as a means to promote its foreign policy goal is a means of expanding trade ties with the developing world, China has to find a way of balancing between the two camps.
Saturday, 24 April 2010
Turkey use public diplomacy to strengthen relations with the Arab World
Over the last few decades, there has been much public diplomacy has been described as another form of propaganda by many, but is it?
As we know, public diplomacy is a transparent method adopted by a sovereign country by which it communicates with other countries around the world that influences foreign audiences widely and promotes national interest. Public diplomacy includes activities such as exchange programs, visits, T.V broadcasting, radio and cultural events.
With the development in technology and communication, there is a need for more access and transparency in order to reach out and gain support as well as inform the wider public. This in no way a means of replacing traditional diplomatic practices but as it is mentioned above; it is a means of informing the wider public in order to gain their support on certain issues and matters.
A recent example of public diplomacy is the launch of the channel At Turkiyya by the Turkish government in Arabic in order to unite the Arab and Turkish world as well as break down barriers between them emphasising that this is not propaganda. The previous broadcast that was in Turkey was ‘lost in translation’ which therefore created a misunderstanding, therefore the establishment of At Turkiyyah will enable them to get rid of intermediaries and explain the culture, art and geography as it is in the Arab world. This is in no way replacing traditional diplomacy, but is a good example of what pubic diplomacy aims to achieve and that is to inform the wider foreign audience regarding the sovereign state.
Quantra. (2010) available at: http://www.qantara.de/webcom/show_article.php/_c-476/_nr-1319/i.html (accessed on 23/04/2010)
Sunday, 18 April 2010
most important aspect of the new diplomacy
Public Diplomacy
Public Diplomacy is a conduct of foreign policy by engagement with foreign public. Music, film, sports diverse citizens to understand each other. In my opinion public diplomacy is one of the tools of the soft power. Main objective of the public diplomacy is to create a positive image view or thought about a particular actor or country. It is in every country's interest to attract foreigners with their cultures traditions and make their country popular among the others. During the cold war between the superpowers U.S.A and U.S.S.R public diplomacy was very popular. Both superpowers competing with each other and trying to attrach other state actors was also part of public diplomacy. When we look at American foreign policy we can see that public diplomacy played a significant role. New advanced technology is very important in exercising public diplomacy and achieving its primary goals. For example after a terrorist attack in september 11th US government tried its best to improve public diplomacy in middle east and in Islamic World.
Most significant change in the nature of diplomacy.
Diplomacy is a process of communication between political entities. One of the most significant change in the nature of diplomacy is the structure of diplomacy. Where states are not only actors involved in diplomacy there are also international organisations. There are two types of international organisations intergovernmental and non-governmental. Intergovernmental is with governments only as members and non-governmental means with groups as members or private individuals. According to Baylis and Smith the increasing number of non-state actors has changed the nature of the new diplomacy and the process of negotiations and decisions. For example establishment of international organisation as League of Nations after the end of Second World War it acted as peaceful settlement of disputes and international forum.
Friday, 16 April 2010
New actors in the field of diplomacy
This shows how governments is changing state and non-state communicative dynamics and influences in the new era of diplomacy.
Thursday, 15 April 2010
The most important aspect of the new diplomacy: the emergence of new actors
Diplomacy as we have seen throughout this module, has been changing and evolving. The evolution has been made from the traditional diplomacy to the new diplomacy practiced presently. The most important aspect of the new diplomacy is the emergence of new actors in the international system. Actors such as international organisations, NGOs and MNCs. The number of NGOs has risen from 176 in 1909 to 21,026 in 2006. (Leguey-Feilleux, pp 105: 2009) The number of NGOs has had an increase of more than 80% in less than a century. And with that increase in number, came an increase in power and influence.
Leguey-Feilleux states a brilliant example; this being the success in achieving the banning of landmines in December 1997. This was the result of the influence of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) and the NGOs involved with them, which were more than 1200, on governments. (Ibid, pp 122-128: 2009) As stated by Leguey-Feilleux, ‘it was a remarkable achievement for civil society in the diplomatic process, an example of partnership with governmental institutions.’ (Ibid, pp 128: 2009) Governments have realised that it is in their interest and benefit to keep the NGOs on their side to avoid problems and public uprising. International organisations nowadays have a voice and a say, and help set the international agenda. Even if the issues raised are not dealt with immediately by the government, the international organisations at least manage to shed light on them. Depending on the support of the public and campaigning by the organisation, the issue in question might reach a point where the government will not be able to ignore it anymore and will address it.
Such an issue nowadays is that of climate change. NGOs have put it out in the open and spread the word. People are more and more involved in wanting governments to act in relation to it because it is something that affects everyone. Thus, climate change is on the agenda for quite a large number of countries nowadays. The 2009 Copenhagen Summit spurred a lot of manifestations and demonstrations across the world. In London alone, The Wave demonstration gathered around 20,000-40,000 people. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8396696.st
The role of new actors in the international system is one which is gaining greater strength. The government prefers to keep NGOs on their side as they can be of use to them when it comes to negotiations for example, as a country is more willing to talk to an NGO than to a government sometimes. Diplomacy has been evolving and will continue to do so, as globalisation has done until now.
Leguey-Feilleux (2009) ‘The Dynamics of Diplomacy’ London: Lynne RIenner Publishers
Most Important Aspect of the “New” Diplomacy
The main difference between bilateral diplomacy and multilateral diplomacy is that bilateral diplomacy is conducted between two governments on a one-to-one basis, but multilateral diplomacy on the other hand is conducted on a more complex environment, where one government has to deal with several other governments and those other governments in their own turn have to deal with all the other governments, or more simply- “dealing with several governments simultaneously” (Walker, 2004, p-16) “within the organization, while seeking to fulfill the mission given to the organization by the states that created it.”(Leguey-Feilleux, 2009: 217). Though in purpose, both bilateral and multilateral diplomacy are similar in a sense that in both cases states mainly act in their own national interests- as in Multilateral diplomacy is seen as “Acting globally, to benefit locally”. (Walker, 2004, p21)
As for main characteristics of multilateral diplomacy are:
“Parliamentary” or “Diplomacy by parliamentary procedures” or “Open diplomacy”
(note the Press behind)
It is “Open” only on the surface though, because it is argued that genuine agreements and negotiations take place confidentially in a more complex environment, thereby this process is criticized as corruption of diplomacy.
Therefore, one of the most important aspects of multilateral diplomacy is the process through which decisions/agreements are reached, that is through “informal consultations”, that could take place outside of official meetings, during lunches and etc.
Also, during such multilateral or conference diplomacy, the formation of coalitions or blocs play an important role in decision making, where “intrabloc diplomacy” takes place.
As for the reasons why do I consider Multilateral Diplomacy as the main aspect of the “new” diplomacy, because even though similar to conference diplomacy took place during the Concert of Europe in the form of Congresses in 1815-1856, where delegates also met for discussions and negotiations, which constitutes that it is not so “new” after all, I still think that contemporary Multilateral Diplomacy is different, because it is more effective and multidimensional.
This is observable through some of the main purposes of Multilateral Diplomacy:
o Information gathering and pooling, as the process of “peer review”
o Joint projects, that are useful in achieving ones own objectives in the issues that need joint management.
o Management of the external environment, where for example agreements on opening the markets at the WTO (World Trade Organization) can benefit the trade environment in certain regions, or agreements reached on Chemical Weapons Convention can create a more secure environment.
o Influencing behavior, where “governments who wish to influence are within the sovereign control of other states”. (Walker,2004, p18)
o Entering into mutually beneficial contracts, where both states should end up with good deals.
o Domestic agenda salvation processes, where states “see the international scene primarily as an extension of the domestic” (Walker,2004, p19).
o Reactive character of states, where if one state brings up a topic, other state that is in concern has to follow suit (even if the state would rather to dismiss the topic) in order to ensure that its own interests are not damaged.
o Meetings take place in routine-annually or at regular intervals planned basis.
(Walker, 2004, pp:16-20)
Thus, as Walker argues: “Multilateral Diplomacy is not different in purpose from bilateral diplomacy; it is merely one of the implements in the toolkit available to governments for coping with issues as they arise” (Walker, 2004, p-21).
Bibliography:
Leguey-Feilleux, Jean-Robert, (2009), The Dynamics of Diplomacy , Lynne Rienner Publishers, London.
Walker, Ronald A.,(2004) Multilateral Conferences: Purposeful International Negotiation. Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations, Palgrave Macmillan.
Pictures available at:
http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/8KQfXW-Q3ov/IMF+WB+2008+Fall+Meetings+Washington+DC